HomeBack to the synthesis

Psilocybin research evidence map

Does one dose of psilocybin rewire the brain?

Explore the papers behind each claim and the reasons those claims are connected. These are source links and editorial assessments; proposed interpretations remain questions.

24 source papers · 23 claims · 13 relationships
Synthesis updated

Showing 24 of 24 papers and 23 of 23 claims

Jump to selected details

Selected Claim 1. In healthy volunteers, a single 25 mg dose left enduring functional brain changes “largely absent” one month later, though some diffusion-imaging and network-modularity signals persisted; what lasted was mainly psychological: well-being and insight.

Paper cited for claimEditorial relationshipPosed question
Source papersClaims in this synthesisLyons 2026Daws 2022Jiang 2026Nardou 2023Novelli 2025Carhart-Harris 2021Goodwin 2022Shao 2021Siegel 2024Johansen 2026Pasquini 2026Bhagavan 2026Madsen 2024Brendstrup-Brix 2026Harding 2025Farré-Colomés 2026Sabbah 2026Kramer 2026Gudmundsen 2026Keenan 2026Sahoo 2026García-Cabrerizo 2025Raison 2023Erritzoe 20241Healthy volunteers2Depression patients3Depression patients4Mice5Mice6Cross-cutting7Healthy volunteers8Depression patients9Depression patients10Mice11Humans12Humans13Healthy volunteers14Healthy volunteers15Healthy volunteers16Cluster headache patients17Depression patients18Humans19Rats20Rats21Mice22Mice, Rats23Depression patients

Position and line length are for readability. They do not measure similarity, effect size or certainty. Paper-to-paper citations are not shown.

Browse as a list · 23 claims
  1. Lyons 2026

    Read the claim and sources
  2. Daws 2022

    Read the claim and sources
  3. Daws 2022

    Read the claim and sources
  4. Jiang 2026

    Read the claim and sources
  5. Nardou 2023

    Read the claim and sources
  6. Nardou 2023, Lyons 2026, Shao 2021

    Read the claim and sources
  7. Siegel 2024

    Read the claim and sources
  8. Goodwin 2022

    Read the claim and sources
  9. Carhart-Harris 2021

    Read the claim and sources
  10. Shao 2021

    Read the claim and sources
  11. Lyons 2026, Daws 2022, Carhart-Harris 2021, Pasquini 2026, Harding 2025, Erritzoe 2024

    Read the claim and sources
  12. Novelli 2025

    Read the claim and sources
  13. Johansen 2026

    Read the claim and sources
  14. Pasquini 2026

    Read the claim and sources
  15. Bhagavan 2026

    Read the claim and sources
  16. Madsen 2024, Brendstrup-Brix 2026

    Read the claim and sources
  17. Harding 2025

    Read the claim and sources
  18. Farré-Colomés 2026, Sabbah 2026

    Read the claim and sources
  19. Kramer 2026

    Read the claim and sources
  20. Gudmundsen 2026

    Read the claim and sources
  21. Keenan 2026

    Read the claim and sources
  22. Sahoo 2026, García-Cabrerizo 2025

    Read the claim and sources
  23. Raison 2023, Erritzoe 2024

    Read the claim and sources
What is included, and when it changes

The map follows the published synthesis. A new discovery enters the published map only through a versioned update. Line length is a layout choice, not an evidence score. Semantic similarity and paper-to-paper citation networks are not included in this version.

Latest saved discovery scan: . It contains 1593 discovered candidates. Screening status is not recorded in this snapshot. Discovered candidates are not automatically included as evidence.

Editorial assessment is not independent scientific validation. Review status and limitations remain attached to the full claims.

A Violema evidence system. How PsychDoc finds and checks papers · Explore the method

© 2026 Violema, Inc.